WAN Video GeneratorWAN Video Generator

Best Veo 3.1 & Wan 2.5 Alternatives: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide

Jacky Wangon a day ago

Best Alternatives to Veo 3.1 & Wan 2.5: 2025 Complete Guide

Executive Summary

Google Veo 3.1 and Alibaba/Qwen's Wan 2.5 have revolutionized text-to-video generation with professional-grade features: native audio synthesis, 1080p-4K output, and precise scene control.

However, each platform presents unique trade-offs:

  • Pricing models that may not fit all budgets
  • Geographic availability restrictions
  • Prompt fidelity variations
  • Post-production capabilities differences

This comprehensive guide explores:

  1. βœ… 8 top alternatives to Veo 3.1 - with detailed specs and pricing
  2. βœ… 8 leading competitors to Wan 2.5 - including emerging platforms
  3. βœ… Side-by-side comparisons - helping you choose the right tool
  4. βœ… Hybrid workflow strategies - to maximize your creative output

Table of Contents


Part 1: Top Veo 3.1 Alternatives in 2025 {#part-1-veo-31-alternatives}

What is Google Veo 3.1?

Google Veo 3.1 represents the cutting edge of Google's AI video generation technology. The latest iteration includes features like native audio synthesis across every generation mode and minute-long scene extensions for continuous storytelling[^1], along with:

  • πŸ’‘ Advanced lighting controls with scene re-lighting capabilities
  • 🎬 "Ingredients-to-Video" pipeline integrated within Google Flow
  • πŸ’° Paid preview access through Gemini (same token cost as Veo 3.0)

Why Consider Veo 3.1 Alternatives?

While Veo 3.1 excels in many areas, creators often seek alternatives for these key reasons:

1. Access & Cost Limitations

  • 🌍 Geographic restrictions: Flow's paid preview is currently US-only
  • πŸ’΅ Token-based pricing: Heavy usage can lead to rapidly escalating costs
  • πŸ“Š Budget unpredictability: Per-token charges make cost planning challenging

2. Creative Control Constraints

  • 🎭 Character consistency: Cannot lock character appearance across multiple shots
  • πŸ”„ Asset management: Limited control over recurring visual elements
  • 🎨 Style persistence: Challenging to maintain consistent aesthetics

3. Technical Workflow Requirements

  • πŸ”“ Open-source needs: Some filmmakers prefer transparent, customizable tools
  • πŸ”Œ API integration: Direct hooks into 3D pipelines may be unavailable
  • πŸ› οΈ Post-production limitations: Limited native editing capabilities

Top 8 Veo 3.1 Alternatives: Complete Comparison

Quick Comparison Table

Rank AI Video Tool Resolution / Length Pricing
πŸ₯‡ 1 OpenAI Sora 2 1080p, up to 25s (Pro) Free tier (15s) β†’ $20 Pro/month
πŸ₯ˆ 2 Wan 2.5 4K, 10s, lip-sync Free on multiple platforms
πŸ₯‰ 3 Runway Gen-3 Alpha 1080p, 18s average $12-$76/month tiers
4 Pika 1.0 1024Γ—576, 3-4s Free tier + $10/month
5 Luma Dream Machine 1920Γ—1080, 6-8s In-app credits
6 PixVerse v4.5 720p, 5s Freemium (mobile/web)
7 Kling (Tencent) 1080p demo, 5s loops Invite-only beta
8 Haiper 720p, 5s Experimental, free

Feature Highlights

Tool Native Audio Best Use Case
OpenAI Sora 2 βœ… Yes Story-driven clips, storyboard exports
Wan 2.5 βœ… Yes Budget-friendly, multilingual voice synthesis
Runway Gen-3 Alpha πŸ”œ Coming soon Precise camera moves, motion realism
Pika 1.0 ❌ No Rapid ideation, live editing
Luma Dream Machine ❌ No 3D layout & VFX pre-visualization
PixVerse v4.5 ❌ No Social media video & mobile-first creators
Kling (Tencent) ❌ No Hyper-realistic motion rendering
Haiper ❌ No R&D projects, quick experiments

AI Video Generators Comparison - Veo 3.1, Wan 2.5, Sora 2, Runway Gen-3, Pika, Luma, PixVerse, Kling and Haiper logos and features comparison

Visual comparison of top 8 AI video generation platforms including Google Veo 3.1, Alibaba Wan 2.5, OpenAI Sora 2, Runway Gen-3 Alpha, Pika 1.0, Luma Dream Machine, PixVerse, Kling, and Haiper

πŸš€ Try All Models: Access all these AI video generators in one place at Pollo AI Video Platform β†’

πŸ’‘ Pro-tip: Combine Sora 2's "Multishot" feature with Runway's Gen-3 in-painting to maintain continuity across scenesβ€”an area where Veo struggles, especially with complex prompt chains.

In-Depth Analysis: Top 3 Veo 3.1 Alternatives

1. OpenAI Sora 2: The Physics-Aware Powerhouse

OpenAI Sora 2 has set a new standard in AI video generation with its physics-aware motion engine and synchronized dialogue capabilities[^2].

🎯 Key Features:

  • Extended clip duration: Up to 25-second clips for Pro subscribers
  • Physics realism: Industry-leading motion physics simulation
  • Developer-friendly: REST/GraphQL API (early-access) for production pipelines
  • Prompt adherence: Best-in-class accuracy for complex prompts
  • Storyboard export: Seamlessly integrate with post-production workflows

βœ… Strengths:

  • Longest clip duration among mainstream alternatives
  • Robust content moderation system
  • Professional storyboard export functionality
  • Excellent for narrative storytelling

⚠️ Limitations:

  • Geographic restrictions (US/EU only)
  • Occasional lip-sync issues in clips longer than 20 seconds
  • Premium pricing for longer clips

πŸ’° Pricing:

  • Free tier: 15-second clips
  • Pro plan: $20/month for 25-second clips

2. Wan 2.5: The Budget-Friendly 4K Option

Often positioned as the "affordable Veo", Wan 2.5 delivers exceptional value with 4K output, multilingual voice synthesis, and accurate lip-sync capabilities[^3].

🎯 Key Features:

  • 4K resolution: Professional-quality output
  • Multilingual audio: Native support for multiple languages
  • Lip-sync accuracy: Precise mouth movement matching
  • Ambient SFX: Built-in sound effects library
  • Free access: Many platforms offer free 4K generations

βœ… Strengths:

  • Completely free 4K video generation on multiple platforms
  • Excellent multilingual voice synthesis
  • Perfect for TikTok, Instagram Reels, and e-learning content
  • Native audio integration

⚠️ Limitations:

  • Shorter clip length (≀10 seconds maximum)
  • Limited post-production editing tools
  • Fewer camera control options compared to premium alternatives

πŸ’° Pricing:

  • Free: Available on multiple wrapper platforms (EaseMate, Fotor, FluxPro)

πŸ“– Learn More: Explore WAN 2.5's complete features and pricing or read our detailed WAN 2.5 vs Veo 3.1 comparison for an in-depth technical breakdown.


3. Runway Gen-3 Alpha: The Professional's Choice

Runway Gen-3 Alpha represents a complete rebuild of Runway's training stack, optimized for multimodal scaling and professional production workflows.

🎯 Key Features:

  • Enhanced consistency: Sharper scene coherence across frames
  • 24fps motion: Smooth, professional-grade animation
  • Turbo tier: 50% cost reduction with 7Γ— faster rendering
  • Fine-grained control: Precise keyframe manipulation
  • Industry integration: Enterprise-grade hosting and support

βœ… Strengths:

  • Unmatched camera control and keyframe precision
  • Excellent for brand advertising with specific aspect ratios
  • Professional hosting infrastructure
  • Fast turnaround with Turbo tier

⚠️ Limitations:

  • Native audio still in development (coming soon)
  • Premium-only pricing (no free tier)
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced features

πŸ’° Pricing:

  • Standard: $12/month
  • Pro: $28/month
  • Unlimited: $76/month

Decision Guide: Choosing the Right Tool for Your Project

Not sure which AI video generator fits your specific needs? Use this scenario-based guide:

Your Project Type Recommended Tool Why This Choice?
🎬 15-25 second cinematic shorts Sora 2 Longest clip duration + advanced physics engine for realistic motion
πŸ’° Budget-conscious 4K content with voiceover Wan 2.5 Free 4K generation with built-in speech synthesis
πŸ“± Brand advertisements with 9:16 format Runway Gen-3 Superior aspect-ratio flexibility and camera control
🎭 Quick social media memes PixVerse Lightweight mobile app with one-tap sharing
πŸŽ₯ Complex VFX pre-visualization Luma Dream Machine 3D-aware world-building capabilities
πŸš€ Rapid prototyping and ideation Pika 1.0 Live editing with instant feedback

Industry Roadmap: What's Coming Next?

Stay ahead of the curve with these anticipated developments:

Q4 2025: Google Veo 3.1 Updates

  • πŸ”Œ API access via YouTube Create: Public API expected by Q4 2025[^4]
  • 🎨 Enhanced editing tools: More post-production capabilities within Flow
  • 🌍 Geographic expansion: Potential rollout beyond US markets

2025-2026: OpenAI Sora Improvements

  • πŸ“Ί 4K support: Sora 2.1 to debut 4K resolution[^5]
  • πŸ”— Shot-linking: JSON-based prompts for multi-scene continuity
  • ⚑ Faster rendering: Performance optimizations in pipeline

Late 2025: Runway Gen-3 Audio

  • 🎡 Native audio beta: Expected launch in late 2025
  • 🎼 Music generation: AI-composed soundtracks for videos
  • πŸ”Š Sound effects library: Integrated SFX generation

πŸ’‘ Strategy Tip: Maintaining a model-agnostic workflow keeps your production pipeline flexible and resilient against platform changes and feature updates.


Part 2: Best Wan 2.5 Alternatives in 2025 {#part-2-wan-25-alternatives}

Understanding Wan 2.5's Capabilities

Wan 2.5 has emerged as a democratizing force in AI video generation, offering:

  • 🎬 4K resolution: Professional-quality output at maximum resolution
  • ⏱️ 10-second clips: Sufficient for most social media content
  • 🎀 Accurate lip-sync: Precise audio-visual synchronization
  • πŸ”Š Audio-driven generation: Create videos from single prompts with integrated sound
  • πŸ’° Generous free access: Multiple SaaS platforms (EaseMate, Fotor, FluxPro) offer free tiers

🎯 Try It Free: Experience WAN 2.5's capabilities with our free WAN video generator - no signup required!

When to Look Beyond Wan 2.5

Despite its strengths, creators may seek alternatives for these reasons:

1. Duration Limitations

  • ⏱️ 10-second ceiling: Insufficient for longer narratives or tutorials
  • πŸ“– Story complexity: Challenging to develop complete story arcs
  • πŸŽ“ Educational content: Limited for comprehensive explanations

2. Technical Consistency

  • 🎭 Object persistence: Visual elements may drift in complex scenes
  • 🎨 Style stability: Maintaining consistent aesthetics across generations
  • πŸ”„ Character continuity: Challenges with recurring characters

3. Professional Workflow Integration

  • βœ‚οΈ Timeline editing: Requires external NLE (Non-Linear Editor)
  • 🎬 Non-destructive edits: Limited native editing capabilities
  • πŸ”Œ API access: Fewer integration options for production pipelines

Top 8 Wan 2.5 Alternatives: Comprehensive Comparison

Technical Specs Comparison

Rank Alternative Platform Resolution / Length Audio Support
πŸ₯‡ 1 Google Veo 3.1 1080p, 60s extension βœ… Yes
πŸ₯ˆ 2 OpenAI Sora 2 1080p, 25s (Pro) βœ… Yes
πŸ₯‰ 3 Runway Gen-3 Alpha 1080p, 18s πŸ”œ Roadmap
4 Kling & Hailuo 1080p demos ❌ No
5 Luma Dream Machine 1080p, 8s ❌ No
6 Pika 1.0 1024Γ—576, 4s ❌ No
7 PixVerse v4.5 720p, 5s ❌ No
8 Haiper Experiment 512p, 6s ❌ No

Standout Features

Platform Key Differentiator
Google Veo 3.1 Scene re-lighting + continuous extension
OpenAI Sora 2 Advanced physics realism engine
Runway Gen-3 Alpha Precise keyframe camera movements[^11]
Kling & Hailuo Ultra-realistic motion rendering
Luma Dream Machine 3D-aware world-building[^12]
Pika 1.0 Live on-canvas editing
PixVerse v4.5 Mobile-first publishing workflow
Haiper Experiment Novel latent-warping techniques

πŸ“š Related Comparisons: Dive deeper with our WAN 2.5 vs Sora 2 analysis and Sora 2 vs Veo 3 head-to-head comparison.

Premium Upgrades: Three Superior Alternatives

1. Google Veo 3.1: Extended Duration Leader

Google Veo 3.1 addresses Wan 2.5's primary limitationβ€”clip durationβ€”while adding professional-grade editing features.

🎯 What Sets It Apart:

  • 60-second extensions: 6Γ— longer than Wan 2.5's limit
  • Object-removal tool: Professional editing within the platform
  • Audio coherence: Maintains synchronized sound throughout extended clips
  • Multi-shot continuity: Seamless transitions between scenes

Best For: Brand storytelling, product demonstrations, extended narratives


2. OpenAI Sora 2: Physics & Narrative Excellence

Sora 2 surpasses Wan 2.5 with superior physics simulation and narrative chaining capabilities.

🎯 Key Advantages:

  • 25-second duration: 2.5Γ— longer than Wan 2.5
  • Physics engine: Realistic object interactions and motion
  • Shot chaining: Link multiple clips into cohesive sequences
  • Narrative flow: Perfect for ads requiring story progression

Best For: Narrative advertising, story-driven content, cinematic productions


3. Runway Gen-3 Alpha: Agency-Grade Performance

Runway Gen-3 targets professional agencies with speed, affordability, and precision.

🎯 Professional Features:

  • Turbo tier: 7Γ— faster rendering speed[^10]
  • 50% cost reduction: More economical for high-volume production
  • Variant generation: Create dozens of variations efficiently
  • Coming audio: Will directly compete with Wan 2.5 once launched

Best For: Marketing agencies, A/B testing, high-volume content creation

Smart Migration Strategy: When to Switch

Your Requirement Upgrade To Reason
Clips longer than 10 seconds Sora 2 Free tier offers up to 15s; Pro extends to 25s
60-second branded content Veo 3.1 Scene extension capabilities with audio sync
Frame-accurate VFX work Runway Gen-3 Keyframe scrubbing + developer-friendly API
Quick meme loops PixVerse Simplified 2-step workflow, mobile-optimized
3D-integrated projects Luma Dream Machine 3D-aware generation + Firefly plugin support

Hybrid Workflow: Combining Multiple Tools {#hybrid-workflows}

The Professional's Multi-Tool Strategy

Maximize quality and minimize costs by strategically combining platforms. Here's a proven 4-step workflow:

Step 1: Base Generation with Wan 2.5

  • βœ… Generate 4K foundation clip with lip-synced voiceover (free)
  • βœ… Leverage native audio for perfect voice synchronization
  • βœ… Export high-quality base for further enhancement

Cost: $0 (free tier)

Step 2: Duration Extension with Sora 2

  • βœ… Upload final frame from Wan 2.5 clip as starting point
  • βœ… Use multishot feature to extend by 20 seconds
  • βœ… Maintain visual continuity between segments

Cost: $20/month (Pro subscription)

Step 3: Transition Polish with Runway Gen-3 Turbo

  • βœ… Apply optical-flow processing for seamless transitions
  • βœ… Enhance motion consistency across clip boundaries
  • βœ… Leverage 7Γ— faster rendering for quick iterations

Cost: $12-28/month (Standard/Pro tier)

Step 4: Final Branding in Premiere Pro

  • βœ… Import composite video from previous steps
  • βœ… Add brand elements via Motion Templates
  • βœ… Export final 60-second commercial

Cost: $22.99/month (Adobe CC subscription) or free (DaVinci Resolve)


Workflow Benefits

πŸ’° Total Monthly Cost: ~$54.99 (vs. $200+ for single high-tier platform)

🎯 What You Get:

  • 60-second professional commercial length
  • 4K base resolution
  • Native audio + lip-sync
  • Professional transitions
  • Brand integration
  • Multi-platform flexibility

πŸ’‘ Pro Insight: This hybrid approach lets solo creators and small agencies compete with studios using expensive single-platform solutionsβ€”without the enterprise-level subscription costs.


Future Developments: 2025-2026 Roadmap

Stay ahead of industry trends with these anticipated updates:

Q1 2026: Wan 3.0 Major Release

  • 🎬 20-second clips: 2Γ— current duration limit
  • 🎡 Audio remix tools: Enhanced sound editing capabilities
  • πŸ”§ Timeline editor: Built-in non-destructive editing

2025: Sora 2.1 Enhanced Features

  • πŸ“Ί 4K resolution support: Professional broadcast quality
  • πŸ”— Scene-link JSON prompts: Developer-friendly shot chaining
  • ⚑ Performance improvements: Faster generation times

Late 2025: Runway Gen-3 Audio Launch

  • 🎼 Native audio beta: Compete directly with audio-enabled platforms
  • πŸ”Š Sound library: Integrated sound effects database
  • 🎡 Music generation: AI-composed background scores

πŸ’‘ Strategy Recommendation: Maintain platform-agnostic workflows to quickly adapt when new features launch. Don't lock yourself into a single ecosystem.


Frequently Asked Questions {#frequently-asked-questions}

General Questions

Q: Which AI video generator is best for beginners in 2025?

A: Wan 2.5 and PixVerse are ideal for beginners:

  • Both offer generous free tiers
  • Simple, intuitive interfaces
  • No complex technical setup required
  • Immediate results without learning curve

For slightly more advanced users, Pika 1.0 provides live editing features that help you learn through experimentation.

πŸš€ Get Started: Try our free text-to-video generator to create your first AI video in minutes.


Q: Can I use these AI video generators for commercial projects?

A: Yes, most platforms allow commercial use, but terms vary[^6][^7][^8][^9]:

Platform Commercial Use License Type
Sora 2 βœ… Yes Standard commercial license
Runway Gen-3 βœ… Yes Full commercial rights (Pro+)
Wan 2.5 βœ… Yes Check wrapper platform terms
Veo 3.1 βœ… Yes Google Gemini terms apply

Always verify current licensing terms on official platform websites before using generated content commercially.


Q: Which tool is best for creating YouTube content?

A: For YouTube content, we recommend:

  1. Sora 2 (15-25s clips) - Best for shorts and intros
  2. Veo 3.1 (up to 60s) - Ideal for longer explanatory segments
  3. Hybrid workflow - Combine Wan 2.5 + Sora 2 for full-length videos

Consider clip length requirements and your content style when choosing.


Technical Questions

Q: Do these tools require powerful hardware to run?

A: No! All platforms mentioned are cloud-based, meaning:

  • βœ… No GPU required
  • βœ… Works on any modern computer
  • βœ… Even compatible with tablets/mobile devices (some platforms)
  • βœ… All processing happens on the provider's servers

You only need a stable internet connection.


Q: Can I edit videos after generation?

A: Editing capabilities vary by platform:

Native Editing:

  • Veo 3.1: Object removal, scene extension, re-lighting
  • Pika 1.0: Live on-canvas editing
  • Runway Gen-3: Keyframe manipulation, in-painting

External Editor Required:

  • Wan 2.5: Limited native editing
  • Sora 2: Basic storyboard tools only
  • Luma: Export for external NLE

For advanced editing, plan to use Adobe Premiere, Final Cut Pro, or DaVinci Resolve.


Q: How long does video generation typically take?

A: Generation times vary significantly:

Platform Average Time Notes
Runway Gen-3 Turbo 30-60 seconds Fastest option
Sora 2 2-5 minutes Standard processing
Wan 2.5 1-3 minutes Depends on platform
Veo 3.1 3-7 minutes Higher quality = longer wait
Pika 1.0 1-2 minutes Quick iterations

Peak usage times may increase wait times.


Pricing & Access Questions

Q: What's the most budget-friendly option?

A: Budget ranking (from cheapest to most expensive):

  1. πŸ₯‡ Wan 2.5 - Completely free on multiple platforms
  2. πŸ₯ˆ Pika 1.0 - Generous free tier + $10/month
  3. πŸ₯‰ Runway Gen-3 - Starting at $12/month
  4. Sora 2 - $20/month for Pro features
  5. Veo 3.1 - Token-based (costs vary)

For absolute beginners: Start with Wan 2.5 (free) and upgrade as needed.


Q: Are there geographic restrictions?

A: Some platforms have regional limitations:

Restricted:

  • Veo 3.1: US-only (currently)
  • Sora 2: US/EU primarily

Globally Available:

  • Wan 2.5: Worldwide access
  • Runway Gen-3: Global availability
  • Pika 1.0: No restrictions
  • Luma: Worldwide

Check current availability as platforms expand regularly.


Q: Can I cancel subscriptions anytime?

A: Yes! All major platforms offer flexible cancellation:

  • βœ… No long-term contracts
  • βœ… Cancel anytime
  • βœ… Pro-rated refunds (varies by platform)
  • βœ… Access continues until period ends

Always review specific platform cancellation policies before subscribing.


Quality & Features Questions

Q: Which platform has the best audio generation?

A: Audio quality leaders:

  1. Wan 2.5 - Best multilingual voice synthesis + lip-sync
  2. Veo 3.1 - Excellent ambient audio + SFX coherence
  3. Sora 2 - Good dialogue sync, occasional issues >20s

Audio coming soon:

  • Runway Gen-3 (late 2025)
  • Pika 1.0 (roadmap)

πŸ’¬ Audio Sync Tutorial: Learn how to create perfect lip-synced videos with our speech-to-video guide.


Q: Can these tools maintain character consistency across multiple videos?

A: This remains a challenge across all platforms:

Limited Consistency:

  • Most platforms struggle with exact character replication
  • Workaround: Use detailed, consistent prompts
  • Consider custom model training (enterprise features)

Best Options:

  • Runway Gen-3: Best keyframe control for consistency
  • Hybrid approach: Generate base character, use as reference

Expect improvements in 2025-2026 updates.


Q: What resolution should I use for different platforms?

A: Platform-specific recommendations:

Destination Recommended Resolution Best Tool
Instagram Reels 1080Γ—1920 (9:16) Runway Gen-3
YouTube Shorts 1080Γ—1920 (9:16) Sora 2
TikTok 1080Γ—1920 (9:16) Wan 2.5
YouTube Main 1920Γ—1080 (16:9) Veo 3.1
Facebook 1280Γ—720 or 1920Γ—1080 Any platform
Professional/Broadcast 4K (3840Γ—2160) Wan 2.5

Conclusion: Making Your Choice

The AI video generation landscape in 2025 offers unprecedented options for creators at every levelβ€”from hobbyists to professional studios.

Key Takeaways

🎯 For Budget-Conscious Creators:

  • Start with Wan 2.5 (free 4K + audio)
  • Upgrade to Pika 1.0 ($10/month) for editing features
  • Scale to Sora 2 ($20/month) when you need longer clips

🎬 For Professional Productions:

  • Choose Runway Gen-3 for precision and speed
  • Use Veo 3.1 for extended branded content
  • Implement hybrid workflows for maximum flexibility

πŸš€ For Experimenters:

  • Test Haiper and PixVerse for bleeding-edge features
  • Explore Luma for 3D-integrated projects
  • Stay updated on Kling developments

Final Recommendations

Don't limit yourself to a single platform. The most successful creators in 2025:

  1. βœ… Master 2-3 complementary tools rather than one
  2. βœ… Build hybrid workflows that leverage each platform's strengths
  3. βœ… Stay platform-agnostic to adapt to rapid feature changes
  4. βœ… Monitor roadmap updates for upcoming capabilities

Ready to Get Started?

Choose your path based on your immediate needs:

🎬 Want to create your first AI video today?

πŸ“š Learn More About WAN 2.5:


Share This Guide

Found this comparison helpful? Share it with fellow creators:


Last Updated: November 2025 | Next Review: January 2026

This guide is regularly updated to reflect new features, pricing changes, and platform developments. Bookmark this page for the latest information.


References

[^1]: Google DeepMind. (2025). "Veo 3: Generative Video Model." Google DeepMind Blog. https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/veo-3/

[^2]: OpenAI. (2025). "Sora 2: Physics-Based Video Generation." OpenAI Blog. https://openai.com/index/sora/

[^3]: Alibaba Cloud. (2025). "Wan 2.5 Model Overview." Qwen Official Documentation. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/wan-2.5/

[^4]: Google. (2025). "Veo API Developer Preview." Google AI Blog. https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-veo-api/

[^5]: OpenAI. (2025). "Sora Roadmap: 2025-2026." OpenAI Platform Documentation. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/sora

[^6]: OpenAI. "Terms of Use." OpenAI Legal. https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use/

[^7]: Runway AI. "Terms of Service." Runway ML Legal. https://runwayml.com/terms/

[^8]: Alibaba Cloud. "Qwen Terms of Service." https://help.aliyun.com/zh/model-studio/getting-started/terms-of-service

[^9]: Google. "Gemini API Terms of Service." Google AI for Developers. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/terms

[^10]: Runway AI. (2025). "Gen-3 Alpha Turbo: Performance & Pricing." Runway ML Blog. https://runwayml.com/blog/gen-3-alpha-turbo/

[^11]: Runway AI. (2025). "Advanced Motion Control in Gen-3." Runway ML Research. https://research.runwayml.com/gen3-motion-control

[^12]: Luma AI. (2025). "Dream Machine: 3D-Aware Video Generation." Luma Labs Documentation. https://lumalabs.ai/dream-machine